theagedp.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the theagedp.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host theagedp.com. Currently, hosted in Singapore and its service provider is CloudFlare Inc. .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called cloudflare containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

about …just toasting and ruminating…. 08 june 0 comments bit of a nuisance – i’ve got cancer…. posted by david in uncategorized well that was a bit of a nuisance. got referred to east surrey by gp at end of february. consultant told me i had neck cancer (relatively rare, apparently) went into queen victoria hospital, east grinstead in april for an op. big but neat scar on my neck and a bit knackered but still compos mentis. . just about to start second part of procedure – four weeks of radiotherapy keeping calm and carrying on……. 07 february comments off on forget the suffragettes…..it was the suffragists who won the vote for women forget the suffragettes…..it was the suffragists who won the vote for women posted by david in history , liberty , politics , uk politics when the lens of wishful thinking turns history into myth much of the reporting about the centenary of the granting of votes to women has been strong on emotion and weak on historical facts. most of the narrative has been about the “suffragettes” and their militancy, with various celebs and politicians decked out in purple, white and green, the wspu (suffragette) colours. in fact most of the heavy lifting for women’s suffrage was done by millicent fawcett’s “suffragists” (nuwss) who favoured non violent campaigning. it could well be argued that it was the nuwss effort that won the right to vote. yet they (and their colours of red.white and green) have today been overshadowed by the pankhursts and the suffragettes. curiously enough the nuwss was a tad more left wing than the suffragettes. the wspu abandoned action in 1914 and fully supported ww1. although fawcett also supported the war she had to be more circumspect because many of her members were pacifists. nevertheless today even left wingers were decked out in purple white and green when they should have been red, white and green. maybe the passionate grandstanding of the suffragettes has a greater resonance with 21st century culture than the equally determined but less theatrical behaviour of the suffragists. however, although the current commemorations focus, quite rightly, on women gaining the right to vote and the democrat in me celebrates that landmark, the historian in me does get irritated when facts get….massaged….. “the failure of a second bill in 1867 led to the formation of the national society for women’s suffrage in manchester, gradually joined by numerous other branches around the country, which were united in 1897 in the national union of women’s suffrage societies. the suffragists of the nuwss were many more in number than the militants who in 1903 set up the wspu (women’s social and political union) and adopted direct militant action as tactics. by 1914 the nuwss had 50,000 members, the wspu 5,000. the nuwss retained their focus on peaceful campaigning: petitioning, demonstrating, writing, speaking and teaching, organising and lobbying in favour of the vote. many of them saw the violent tactics of the suffragettes as bringing the movement and the credibility of women as aspiring responsible members of political society into disrepute and compromising the female values which they argued were needed in government and society and which necessitated that women should have a vote.” tags: suffragettes , suffragists , voting , women 30 november comments off on the faux outrage over those trump tweets the faux outrage over those trump tweets posted by david in uk politics , usa politics trump, in his crude, brash way, articulates the feelings of many brits and americans on a subject that our “betters” believe ought to be smothered with a soft pillow. of course many muslims are accepting of our values and happy to fit into our society. but there are also a substantial number who espouse a misogynistic, homophobic and inward looking approach and seek to impose their mores upon others in their own locality. if there is any doubt about this then visit tower hamlets or several yorkshire towns. sometimes the sheer horror of this situation and the price paid for turning a blind eye erupts into the public discourse (rotherham, rochdale, sundry acts of terrorism) but it is swiftly sent down the memory hole with a few waves of the islamophobia flag by a political/cultural class who, by and large, are insulated from this problem by wealth and a sense of their own importance. i have no issue with the left leaning media. at least they are open in the way they despise the concerns of those they would describe as the “ignorant masses” but when so called “conservative” journals like the daily telegraph are afraid to refrain from knee jerk “outrage” by avoiding answering serious questions i do despair. am i the only one? tags: islam , outrage , trump , twitter 08 august comments off on “dunkirk” 1958 and 2017….two very different perspectives “dunkirk” 1958 and 2017….two very different perspectives posted by david in film , history , uncategorized , war having seen christopher nolan’s “dunkirk” i remembered that way back in my uni days in leicester at the end of the 50s i had seen a film with the same title starring john mills and bernard lee (actually it was made in 1958). i couldn’t recall much about it but fortunately it’s on amazon prime so a day or so later we watched it on firestick. being nearly sixty years old, of course, some aspects of it are a tad dated. it’s in black and white, some of the scenes are obviously studio bound and the women are either cheerful cockneys or very middle class with cut glass accents. however, at 2 hrs 14 mins the director could take a broader brush approach and not only focus on the beaches (actually camber sands) but also set the scene by looking at the events which led up to the evacuation the story was told through the eyes of three individuals. bernard lee (who later played m in the bond films) was a cynical journalist, john mills a resourceful army corporal and richard attenborough an english factory owner making a handsome living off the army by manufacturing belt buckles. unlike the current film the 1958 production showed how during the period of the “phoney war” of the early months, when there was hardly any fighting most civilians felt disconnected from the war. government and media were complacent and there was a feeling that, in chamberlain’s fateful words “hitler had missed the bus”. by the end of the film, as people flocked to welcome and help the soldiers successfully evacuated from dunkirk the mood had changed. many more in britain felt part of the war. the film also recognised the actions of the rearguard, those soldiers who were ordered to defend the perimeter to the last man and the last bullet in order to protect the men already on the beaches. the first half of the film followed the civilians as they volunteered to take their small boats across to dunkirk and john mills leading his squad through the countryside to the beach. thereafter the storyline was closer to the 2017 movie with some significant exceptions. there was a small medical post in a bar by the front staffed by a handful of doctors and orderlies trying their best to cope under extreme pressure. eventually the chief is sent orders to evacuate the walking wounded to the ships but to leave the most serious cases to await the german forces. three volunteers are requested to stay behind with the patients and inevitably face being taken as pows. they decide to draw lots and one of the three to draw the short straw, when asked his name straw gives a very common jewish name. nothing is said but the look on his face conveys a solemn message. if the film had been rooted in the first world war there would have no concern at being a jewish pow. the 2017 production skirted such issues about the germans… they were just a faceless “enemy” with no hint of darker forces. in 1958 the film picked up on a moment when a simple service was held on the beach. most soldiers of that time were not particularly religious but closeness to danger and death often makes men more conscious of their mortality and the scene showed many of the troops kneeling for the lord’s prayer. maybe by 2017 the film makers felt uncomfortable with the notion of men kneeling in prayer…. we also know that on the beaches at the time there was a feeling that the luftwaffe appeared to be having a free hand in the skies over dunkirk without much opposition. in fact the raf was working very hard further inland to deter enemy planes at quite considerable cost. bur this didn’t stop many of the soldiers feeling angry that the “brylcreem boys” of the raf had let them down. this was picked up in 1958 when john mills had to step in when a raf driver who had got them to the beach was threatened by other soldiers. by 2017 this had been airbrushed out. but the most glaring omission in the recent movie was something picked up in the original film where, sat on the beach, john mills describes the whole business as a mess and ask how on earth the germans had managed to drive britain to the very edge of defeat in such a short time. bernard lee blames it firmly on the “never again” reaction to the bloodshed and suffering of the ’14-’18 war. this had encouraged an ostrich like attitude to the rise of nazi germany. lee said, laconically, that germany had chosen guns before butter while british politicians and the public had chosen the other way around. how could any film made in 2017, in the midst of the continuous hand-wringing built into the commemoration of the first world war, dare to even suggest that it was the motif of “never again” that had led to the slaughter of even more millions during ww2? the 1958 “dunkirk” came from another country. almost every adult involved with the film would have been impacted by the 1940 evacuation. many would have actually had experienced ww2 as soldiers or civilians. even younger folk like myself would have had memories of family in uniform and stories about the blitz. but now there is very little connection with those experiences at first hand. both films have their strengths and weaknesses. both are, on balance, artistically sound. but both are also of their moment – and if you want to get closer to how people felt at the time then “dunkirk” 1958 wins hands down. tags: dunkirk , films , ww2 29 july comments off on dunkirk – the battle of the perimeter dunkirk – the battle of the perimeter posted by david in film , history one thing not included in dunkirk was the fact that an anglo french rearguard held back german forces for long enough to ensure the evacuation from the beaches could take place at all. it meant that the retreat was not a rout. as the duke of wellington is alleged to have once said. “any fool can win a battle but the best generals know when to retreat and when they do it they do it damned well” valuable time was gained from hitler’s inexplicable ‘halt order’, which suspended the panzers’ advance for 2-3 crucial days, whilst the german tank forces were replenished. this gave the allies the opportunity to set up strongpoints in key towns and villages such as lille, la bassée, st venant, festubert, la paradis, steenbecque, hazebrouck, cassel, wormhout, bergues, ypres, noordschote, dixmuide, veurne and nieuwpoort. these strongpoints were manned by experienced troops of the british 2nd division and a variety of scratch units. for the most part, their orders were simple: ‘fight to the last man and the last round’. the heroic sacrifice of these rearguard units and of the french 1st army at lille, allowed the bulk of the bef and two french divisions to escape up the rapidly-shrinking corridor to dunkirk read more 29 july comments off on dunkirk – the film dunkirk – the film posted by david in film , history , war just saw dunkirk ….a brilliant film and a serious attempt to portray an event that has become deeply embedded in the british folk memory of ww2. it’s also an unusual war film in the sense that dialogue is minimal and the emphasis is almost entirely on the visual. there are also very few “heroics”, indeed much of the film is understated and almost passive. there are bursts of violence but also a lot of the “waiting around” that often characterises military life. episodes of courage occur but we also see the panic and confusion that war films tend to underplay. it’s also a film about men…there are a few women but they are peripheral to the narrative and very much in the background. a few decades ago there would have been the compulsory “love interest” of either wives at home or nurses aboard but moviemaking seems to be growing up. men die but there is very little blood or dismemberment. in fact the dead are just “there” either to be stepped over or pushed aside. you do leave the cinema, however, grateful that that over 330,000 of these soldiers escaped to fight another day and, even more that you weren’t a man born in britain between 1900 and 1922…… 11 may comments off on facebook feminists quite happy to call theresa may the c word… facebook feminists quite happy to call theresa may the c word… posted by david in liberal/left , politics , uk politics am i the only person whose facebook timeline has uncovered posts from apparently well educated, middle class women (usually in their late 20s/early 30s) who regularly proclaim their feminist purity by railing against male misogyny yet who quite happily call theresa may a b**** or a c***? these are women who would prickle with resentment if you called them “love” or complimented them on the way they dressed. if you called them the c or b word they would go full metal discrimination. they stoutly defend diane abbott against any criticism by swiftly playing the sexist card yet they quite happily fling those words around when pontificating about the conservative leader and do not smack any wrists when their male friends resort to similar name calling in the threads to their posts. there is not a peep of protest. why? it’s because the target of their ire is a) a right wing politician and b) she appears to be winning. hence sisterhood goes out of the window and the claws are unleashed. it happened to margaret thatcher and it also happened to sarah palin (even though she didn’t win) if one were cruel it could be put down to hypocrisy. but since that sin is endemic on the left perhaps it is best filed under bad manners…… tags: 2017 election , conservatives , facebook , feminists , theresa may 10 may comments off on marie le pen is not finished – she has only just begun….. marie le pen is not finished – she has only just begun….. posted by david in europe , france , politics the media and the punditocracy were having orgasms last weekend over the defeat of marie le pen in the french presidential election. “crushed”, “landslide” were just two of the words used in celebration of her loss. consigning mlp to the dustbin of history the hacks went on to gush over emmanuel macron, the young former rothschild banker/civil servant who had “come from nowhere” to win the presidency. come from nowhere….lol…. nobody “comes from nowhere” to win like that. once it was clear that the traditional parties were persona non grata the french and eu political elites needed a package to sell to shore up their interests in the face of le pen’s nationalist and anti globalist rhetoric and the young photogenic former socialist banker fitted the bill perfectly. what the media have failed to grasp is the fact that le pen knew that victory was very much a long shot. her eyes have always been on 2022. what she needed from 2017 was legitimacy – and that she has gained in spades, firstly by coming a close second in the preliminary round despite having zero support from the official french media. then, and this is of even greater significance, she gained the support of over a third of those who voted. in other words a sizeable chunk of the electorate wanted her to lead france. this is something her father (and founder of the front national) could never achieve. in 2002 jean-marie le pen won just 4.5m votes in the presidential run off – his daughter gained 11m. she did well with younger voters and women and easily outmatched macron amongst the working class. marine le pen has broken out of the core rump of the fn faithful and become a major political figure and could lay claim to the mantle of the leader of the opposition to the macron administration she will now capitalise on this by restructuring and rebranding the fn into a broader political movement that can still sell the fn’s seductive fusion of right wing nationalism with left wing social policy but without the old vichyite trappings that always held her father back. she reacted to her defeat with grace and dignity but vowed to carry on i will be at the head of this fight to gather together all of those who choose france first. for those who hope to think that marine le pen is finished – she has only just begun…. tags: marie le pen 28 february comments off on it’s a bit rich for nigel farage to dump on paul nuttall’s failure to win stoke it’s a bit rich for nigel farage to dump on paul nuttall’s failure to win stoke posted by david in uk politics , uncategorized it’s now clear that paul nuttall made a mistake in allowing himself to be hyped into the stoke by election, partly by the media and also by farage/banks. (remember that nigel has never had the cojones to be a candidate in a by election) paul should have brushed off the “frit” nonsense and let a local face stand – the result would then have been seen in a different light. at present may is riding a brexit wave because she is not perceived as a con man like cameron…which is why the tories did well in stoke. what everyone seems to conveniently forget is that nigel lost at thanet in 2015 for a similar reason – tories were nervous about the possibility of a miliband/sturgeon majority in the commons so ukip were not able to siphon off those crucial votes and nigel lost by a much larger margin than john bickley did in the heywood by election in 2014 paul’s task is to rebuild the party from the mess left by two years of civil war so that it is ready for the next opportunity. political energy should be concentrated on the target areas and educating the electorate, using the 2015 manifesto as a framework for policy. selling this should be a collegiate task using as many voices as possible. this was a disappointment not a defeat. hysterical overstatements should be avoided. additionally it should be recalled that nigel has tried to become an mp several times and always failed so his implied criticism of paul was not only untimely but also a tad laughable…….. tags: nigel farage , paul nuttall , stoke , ukip 02 february comments off on we’re leaving the eu and britain’s best days are yet to come…… we’re leaving the eu and britain’s best days are yet to come…… posted by david in eu , europe , uk , uk politics , uncategorized david davis has vowed that britain’s “best days are yet to come” as he laid out the government’s white paper on brexit. the brexit secretary told mps this afternoon said that our vote to leave the eu was a “vote of confidence in the uk’s ability to succeed”. the train out of the eu has now left the station with the remoaners still sobbing in the last carriage while casting a wistful eye towards the massed ranks of faceless eu bureaucrats still gloweringon the platform. of course the guardian/bbc euphiles will still maintain their doomsday chorus of sniping and sneering but, gina miller notwithstanding, our destination of an independent britain where we and we alone decide on our laws is coming nearer brexit day will be march 9 theresa may has set a target date of launching the formal brexit process on march 9. the government is pushing its eu bill through parliament by march 7, which would allow the prime minister to trigger article 50 at a summit of european leaders on march 9 and 10. ministers told the house of lords yesterday that it hopes to have the european union (notification of withdrawal) bill approved by march 7. the following day – march 8 – is the budget, before mrs may travels to brussels for the long-awaited brexit showdown with her eu counterparts. the pm has promised to trigger article 50, the formal mechanism for quitting the eu, by the end of march. we’re on our way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! tags: article 50 , brexit older entries → subscribe to rss recent posts bit of a nuisance – i’ve got cancer…. forget the suffragettes…..it was the suffragists who won the vote for women the faux outrage over those trump tweets “dunkirk” 1958 and 2017….two very different perspectives dunkirk – the battle of the perimeter blogroll a tangled web ace of spades baseball crank biased bbc conservativehome conservatives4palin daily caller dan riehl doug ross free republic guido fawkes hillbuzz hot air http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bristolpalin/ legal insurrection michelle malkin palin promotions palin twibe sissy willis the archway – our theatre the other mccain the taxpayers alliance archives archives select month june 2018 (1) february 2018 (1) november 2017 (1) august 2017 (1) july 2017 (2) may 2017 (2) february 2017 (3) november 2016 (1) september 2016 (1) august 2016 (1) may 2016 (2) march 2016 (1) january 2016 (5) december 2015 (4) november 2015 (3) october 2015 (6) september 2015 (2) august 2015 (1) july 2015 (2) june 2015 (2) may 2015 (4) april 2015 (1) march 2015 (2) february 2015 (3) january 2015 (4) december 2014 (8) november 2014 (5) october 2014 (5) september 2014 (1) august 2014 (2) july 2014 (8) june 2014 (8) may 2014 (10) april 2014 (3) march 2014 (8) february 2014 (8) january 2014 (7) december 2013 (6) november 2013 (6) october 2013 (17) september 2013 (12) august 2013 (3) july 2013 (7) june 2013 (11) may 2013 (7) april 2013 (12) march 2013 (13) february 2013 (9) january 2013 (16) december 2012 (12) november 2012 (17) october 2012 (20) september 2012 (19) august 2012 (9) july 2012 (15) june 2012 (20) may 2012 (23) april 2012 (13) march 2012 (15) february 2012 (12) january 2012 (9) december 2011 (10) november 2011 (17) october 2011 (14) september 2011 (10) august 2011 (8) july 2011 (12) june 2011 (20) may 2011 (22) april 2011 (7) march 2011 (11) february 2011 (10) january 2011 (10) december 2010 (11) november 2010 (8) october 2010 (13) september 2010 (16) august 2010 (11) july 2010 (20) june 2010 (22) may 2010 (19) april 2010 (7) march 2010 (5) february 2010 (7) january 2010 (4) december 2009 (4) november 2009 (2) october 2009 (1) september 2009 (1) july 2009 (1) june 2009 (3) may 2009 (4) march 2009 (9) december 2008 (1) october 2008 (2) september 2008 (2) june 2008 (2) may 2008 (1) november 2007 (2) august 2007 (1) may 2007 (1) february 2007 (1) january 2007 (3) meta log in entries rss comments rss wordpress.org © 2009 | designed by get a custom design powered by: wordpress hosting by memset dedicated servers 11 visitors online now 2 guests, 9 bots, 0 members max visitors today: 17 at 12:25 am bst this month: 22 at 06-04-2018 10:09 am bst this year: 47 at 01-02-2018 03:33 am gmt all time: 280 at 12-06-2017 12:08 am gmt follow follow get every new post on this blog delivered to your inbox. join other followers:

URL analysis for theagedp.com

http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=ww2
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=ukip
http://www.theagedp.com/?cat=911
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=paul-nuttall
http://www.theagedp.com/?attachment_id=9049
http://www.theagedp.com/?attachment_id=9046
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=conservatives
http://www.theagedp.com/?p=9054#respond
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=stoke
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=women
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=outrage
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=article-50
http://www.theagedp.com/?feed=rss2
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=2017-election
http://www.theagedp.com/?tag=suffragettes
independent.co.uk
amazon.co.uk
archwaytheatre.co.uk
thesun.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk
gov.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: THEAGEDP.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1572947161_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.123-reg.co.uk
Registrar URL: http://www.meshdigital.com
Updated Date: 2017-10-13T01:44:21Z
Creation Date: 2009-10-20T20:26:23Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2020-10-20T20:26:23Z
Registrar: 123-Reg Limited
Registrar IANA ID: 1515
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS.123-REG.CO.UK
Name Server: NS2.123-REG.CO.UK
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-10-13T19:37:20Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR 123-Reg Limited

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =theagedp.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME theagedp.com

  CHANGED 2017-10-13

  CREATED 2009-10-20

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS.123-REG.CO.UK 212.67.202.2

  NS2.123-REG.CO.UK 62.138.132.21

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .